Current:Home > FinanceWashington state lawmakers approve police pursuit and income tax initiatives -Core Financial Strategies
Washington state lawmakers approve police pursuit and income tax initiatives
View
Date:2025-04-14 06:47:20
SEATTLE (AP) — Three conservative-backed initiatives that would give police greater ability to pursue people in vehicles, declare a series of rights for parents of public-school students and bar an income tax were approved by the Washington state Legislature on Monday.
These initiatives are just three of six certified after the group Let’s Go Washington, which is primarily bankrolled by hedge fund executive Brian Heywood, submitted hundreds of thousands of signatures in support of them. Initiatives to overturn the state’s landmark carbon pricing program and tax on the sale of stocks and bonds as well as one that could threaten a long-term care insurance program will likely head straight to voters.
“The 800,000 Washingtonians who signed the initiatives knew they were common sense measures, and the passage of three today proves they are just that,” Heywood said in an email.
The three initiatives approved by the majority Democratic Legislature will be delivered to the secretary of state and take effect 90 days after the session ends.
The police pursuit initiative would mean law enforcement officers would no longer need reasonable suspicion that a person inside a vehicle has committed certain specific crimes, such as a violent offense, sex offense or domestic violence assault, to initiate pursuit. Instead, it would allow police to initiate pursuits if they suspect a person has violated the law.
“We can take a major step right here, right now to protect public safety, to protect our citizens, our constituents,” Republican Sen. Mike Padden said during the vote. “It’s not going to solve all the problems but it’s going to go a long way to make law enforcement better able to do their jobs.”
But Democratic Sen. Patty Kuderer disagreed, saying a lot of law enforcement agencies have moved away from high-speed chases and added restrictions.
“I don’t know why this body would agree that we should lesson our law, which is best practices, to something that increases the potential for public safety to be harmed,” she said.
The rules in the initiative would be base requirements, with individual agencies able to institute more rigorous pursuit standards.
The income tax initiative would not change current law, explained Democratic Sen. June Robinson. Washington is one of nine states that doesn’t have a state income tax. But lawmakers on Monday stressed the importance of codifying it into law.
“It codifies our longstanding tradition that we will not have tax based on personal income,” Republican Rep. Jim Walsh said. “It’s why many of us are here, Mr. Speaker. It’s a great thing about being from Washington.”
The state has considered nearly a dozen ballot measures to add an income tax over the last 92 years, and all but one of them failed, according to the secretary of state’s office. The lone successful measure was in 1932 and it was later overturned by the state Supreme Court.
The other initiative would give parents of public-school students 15 specific rights, including to examine textbooks and curriculum in their child’s classroom, be notified of any changes to the school’s calendar and inspect their child’s public school records. They would also have the right to be notified and opt out of any assignments or activities that include questions about such things as their child’s sexual attractions or their family’s religion or political party.
Many of these rights are already current law. But lawmakers spoke during the votes about this helping parents better understand their rights.
“What the parents want to be able to do -- we have 295 school districts in this state -- they want to know what their individual school is doing; how they’re teaching their children; what the curriculum is; how are their test scores,” said Republican Sen. Perry Dozier.
But Democratic Sen. Lisa Wellman said some of the language may be unclear.
“We have the opportunity now to pass this into law and then clarify anything” that may be ambiguous, she said.
veryGood! (4687)
Related
- Louvre will undergo expansion and restoration project, Macron says
- Stock up & Save 42% on Philosophy's Signature, Bestselling Shower Gels
- America’s animal shelters are overcrowded with pets from families facing economic and housing woes
- Powerball lottery jackpot nearing $600 million: When is the next drawing?
- Moving abroad can be expensive: These 5 countries will 'pay' you to move there
- Gwen Stefani and Blake Shelton are spending New Year's Eve separately. Here's why.
- Federal judge orders texts, emails on Rep. Scott Perry's phone be turned over to prosecutors in 2020 election probe
- AI systems can’t be named as the inventor of patents, UK’s top court rules
- Intellectuals vs. The Internet
- Newcastle goalkeeper Martin Dubravka confronted by a fan on the field at Chelsea
Ranking
- Travis Hunter, the 2
- New York man who served 37 years in prison for killing 2 men released after conviction overturned
- From AI and inflation to Elon Musk and Taylor Swift, the business stories that dominated 2023
- How UPS is using A.I. to fight against package thefts
- Meet first time Grammy nominee Charley Crockett
- Ohio woman charged with abuse of a corpse after miscarriage. What to know about the case
- Southwest Airlines, pilots union reach tentative labor deal
- The poinsettia by any other name? Try ‘cuetlaxochitl’ or ‘Nochebuena’
Recommendation
Trump suggestion that Egypt, Jordan absorb Palestinians from Gaza draws rejections, confusion
Huntley crowned 'The Voice' Season 24 winner: Watch his finale performance
Some state abortion bans stir confusion, and it’s uncertain if lawmakers will clarify them
Southwest Airlines, pilots union reach tentative labor deal
Senate begins final push to expand Social Security benefits for millions of people
Dutch bank ING says it is accelerating its shift away from funding fossil fuels after COP28 deal
What to know about the Colorado Supreme Court's Trump ruling, and what happens next
Germany’s top prosecutor files motion for asset forfeiture of $789 million of frozen Russian money