Current:Home > ScamsFTC wants to ban fake product reviews, warning that AI could make things worse -Core Financial Strategies
FTC wants to ban fake product reviews, warning that AI could make things worse
View
Date:2025-04-18 17:20:22
If the Federal Trade Commission has its way, businesses could soon be fined a hefty sum for hosting or promoting fake product reviews online.
Faux five-star and rave reviews of less-than-stellar consumer goods can boost businesses' profits while deceiving consumers, according to the agency, which has proposed a rule to crack down on companies that buy, sell or promote phony user ratings of their products. If the rule is finalized, violators would be subject to penalties of up to $50,000 per infraction, depending on the case.
"The FTC has seen a massive increase in online reviews in the past few years," Serena Viswanathan, associate director of the FTC's division of ad practices, told CBS News. "We're all using them now to make decisions on whether to buy a product, where to stay on vacation. But unfortunately, with the rise in online reviews we have seen that bad actors can manipulate or fake reviews to deceive consumers for their own benefit."
New types of artificial intelligence tools, which can write human-sounding, but bogus, product reviews, also threaten to compound the problem by enabling bad actors to crank out far more fake reviews, according to the consumer watchdog.
Deceptive reviews hurt consumers by making it hard to obtain factual information about products, regulators say.
"The FTC's proposed rule would make it crystal clear that it's illegal to do things like write or sell fake reviews from people who don't exist or never used the product, or to buy positive reviews or even buy negative reviews about your competitors," Viswanathan said.
Boosting "honest companies"
A steady stream of phony product reviews can boost an item's visibility among consumers while obscuring products from more trustworthy companies, according to experts.
"Our proposed rule on fake reviews shows that we're using all available means to attack deceptive advertising in the digital age," said Samuel Levine, Director of the FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection said in a statement. "The rule would trigger civil penalties for violators and should help level the playing field for honest companies."
According to a U.S. PIRG estimate, between 30% and 40% of online reviews are "concocted or are in some way not genuine." Bogus reviews surged during the pandemic when U.S. shoppers made the bulk of their purchases over the internet versus in stores, the consumer advocacy group noted.
Nearly 90% of online shoppers rely on reviews to guide their purchase decisions, according to PIRG.
"Not only does this harm consumers who are trying to make informed buying decisions, fake reviews also hurt honest businesses who make sure their online reviews are genuine. When people lose confidence in reviews, legitimate positive reviews don't mean as much. So consumers lose. Honest businesses lose. Dishonest businesses win," PIRG said in a report.
Stopping hijackers
The FTC's proposed rule would make selling and buying fake reviews illegal, while also cracking down on a practice known as "review hijacking." This consists of repurposing a genuine consumer review written for one product so that it appears to pertain to a substantially different product.
Also under the proposed enforcement, company insiders cannot review their own products, and businesses cannot bribe people to leave positive reviews or threaten them if they leave negative reviews. Companies would be permitted to offer customers gift cards for leaving a review, so long as the business doesn't dictate what people say about a product.
"We really think that the possibility of significant financial penalties under a rule should make some of these bad actors think twice about writing fake reviews and selling fake reviews," Viswanathan said.
veryGood! (78)
Related
- What to watch: O Jolie night
- Christine King Farris, sister of Martin Luther King Jr., dies at age 95
- Texas Judge Gives No Restitution to Citgo’s Victims in Pollution Case With Wide Implications
- A German Initiative Seeks to Curb Global Emissions of a Climate Super-Pollutant
- B.A. Parker is learning the banjo
- Exxon Accused of Pressuring Witnesses in Climate Fraud Case
- House Republicans request interviews with Justice Department officials in Hunter Biden probe
- Biden says Supreme Court's affirmative action decision can't be the last word
- The 401(k) millionaires club keeps growing. We'll tell you how to join.
- Drew Barrymore Slams Sick Reports Claiming She Wants Her Mom Dead
Ranking
- Nevada attorney general revives 2020 fake electors case
- Overstock.com to rebrand as Bed Bath & Beyond after purchasing its assets
- Exxon Accused of Pressuring Witnesses in Climate Fraud Case
- Susan Boyle Shares She Suffered a Stroke That Impacted Her Singing and Speech
- Nevada attorney general revives 2020 fake electors case
- New York Mayor Champions Economic Justice in Sustainability Plan
- Does aspartame have health risks? Here's what studies have found about the sweetener as WHO raises safety questions.
- Malaria confirmed in Florida mosquitoes after several human cases
Recommendation
Finally, good retirement news! Southwest pilots' plan is a bright spot, experts say
Standing Rock Asks Court to Shut Down Dakota Access Pipeline as Company Plans to Double Capacity
Hunter Biden's former business partner was willing to go before a grand jury. He never got the chance.
As Wildfire Smoke Blots Out the Sun in Northern California, Many Ask: ‘Where Are the Birds?’
Megan Fox's ex Brian Austin Green tells Machine Gun Kelly to 'grow up'
Go Hands-Free With 70% Off Deals on Coach Belt Bags
China’s Ability to Feed Its People Questioned by UN Expert
In the San Joaquin Valley, Nothing is More Valuable than Water (Part 1)